Streaming Services Tier List

Streaming value changes monthly, and everyone is paying for one service they barely open. Twelve services, unranked, judged on library, price and whether the app is usable on a television. All twelve entries begin in Unranked, so the ordering is entirely yours: drag or tap into S–F, rename the rows, share the link or export a PNG.

library depthprice versus what you watchapp quality

12 items pre-filled Misc template Nothing pre-ranked No sign-up

Drag items here

Unranked (12)

Netflix

Disney+

HBO Max

Prime Video

Hulu

Apple TV+

Paramount+

Peacock

Crunchyroll

YouTube Premium

Mubi

Tubi

How this board is built: the 12 tiles are an editorial starting set, not an official roster and not a published ranking — every entry waits in Unranked until you place it. Item tiles are original pictograms or two-letter emblems drawn for this site rather than character artwork, film stills or club logos, so nothing here is licensed material reused from a rights holder. Tiers you set are your own judgement.

What's included in this Streaming Services board

The board arrives with all 12 entries present as tiles and none of them assigned to a tier. That is deliberate: a template that opens with a finished ranking only invites you to agree or disagree with whoever made it, whereas an empty ladder makes you commit to an ordering of your own. Drag a tile onto a row, or on a phone tap the tile and then the tier you want. You can add rows for extra categories, rename the standard ones, and remove any entry you do not recognise — a list you can defend is more useful than a long one you cannot.

How to rank this Streaming Services board

Rank library depth first, but count things you would actually watch rather than total hours. A small curated service can beat a huge one that is 90% filler. Then weigh price against use — the honest question is cost per watched hour, not cost per month. Third, judge the app: search, subtitles, resume behaviour and whether it crashes on a smart TV. Finish by separating originals from catalogue. Some services are worth it for four shows a year; others are worth it as a rotating library. Those are different products, and a list that merges them will mislead both kinds of viewer.

Using the board without over-thinking it

Most people finish a board like this in a couple of minutes and then reorder the middle rows for another ten. That middle is where the honest disagreement lives, so do not rush it: place the obvious top three and the obvious bottom three first, then work inward. If two entries still feel identical, that is a real observation — say so in a row note or a text tile rather than inventing a difference. When the ordering settles, export the PNG so the arrangement is saved somewhere permanent, and copy the share link if you want someone else to argue with it.

Ranking criteria used here

library depth
price versus what you watch
app quality

Before you share it

Put your criterion in the board title, so a reader knows whether they are looking at a favourites list or an analytical one. If the subject changes with patches, seasons or releases, add the date. And remember the share link carries tier names, colours and the tile order — uploaded photos stay on your device, so export a PNG when those matter.